poisonista: (🍎 169)
𝔙𝔦𝔩 𝔖𝔠𝔥𝔬𝔢𝔫𝔥𝔢𝔦𝔱 ([personal profile] poisonista) wrote in [personal profile] fisheyeperspective 2023-06-20 10:14 pm (UTC)

I suppose that answers that. But for the sake of consistency, I want to suggest that Rabbit not be prioritized by Sparrow until and unless it's a clear enough option that it won't hurt either side. And we'll do the same for Sparrow.

[ And he's going to elaborate- ]

Unlike you all, Rabbit doesn't have many ties like that with teams at this time, and it may take a while to improve things for us. The last thing you all need is conflict over this. And we plan to approach similar conflicts with an approach like yours- of figuring it out after we see who is involved.

It'll be easier for us to do that if we know we won't be adding to that conflict and prioritizing a team that may already get the support they need from others. Not that we can predict that, but again- it's something worth looking at while in that situation.

Is that something you all can do?

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting